IPsec and SNAT
Do not MASQ or NAT packets to be tunneledIf you are using IP masquerade or Network Address Translation (NAT) on either gateway, you must now exempt the packets you wish to tunnel from this treatment. For example, if you have a rule like:
# iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 10.0.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
change it to something like:
# iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 10.0.0.0/24 -d ! 172.16.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE
or use passthrough rule
# iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING 1 -o eth0 -s 10.0.0.0/24 -d 172.16.0.0/24 -j RETURN/ACCEPT
or use policy matching !
with iptables 1.3.5 and a Linux kernel > 2.6.15, IPsec policy matching developed by Patrick McHardy was introduced into Linux Netfilter, changing the behaviour of NAT rules in regard to IPsec tunnels. If you e.g. have a general NAT rule for mapping internal addresses to the external interface and want to exempt tunneled traffic from NAT then you must insert an IPsec policy matching rule in front of the SNAT or MASQUERADE rule in the POSTROUTING chain. This is what I'm doing on my productive system:
# iptables -t nat -L
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere policy match dir in pol ipsec mode tunnel
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere policy match dir out pol ipsec mode tunnel
MASQUERADE all -- 10.0.0.0/24 anywhere
# iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -m policy --dir out \
--pol ipsec --mode tunnel -j ACCEPT
# iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -m policy --dir in \
--pol ipsec --mode tunnel -j ACCEPT
This may be necessary on both gateways.
get xt_policy's help info
# iptables -m policy --help
页:
[1]